IN last Sunday’s discussion on this column, Short Cuts received comments thru text messages on the subject matter on VOTE BUYING.
Thru PROS and CONS, they were almost equal in number on the commentaries received by Short Cuts. And based on the comments, they seem to come from both the electorates and from politicians themselves.
And, these are the comments received:
1. “Ug dili ko manghatag, unsa mai tsansa nga ako moda-ug?”
2. “Dili man kana pamalit sa boto. Usa lamang kana ka pahinungod tungod sa kahago sa mga botante sa pag-adto nila sa prosengtohan.”
In Philippine setting, there is a semblance of truth in both concerns.
By way of experience, Short Cuts has never heard of any candidate, most especially in the local level, who won in an election without spending.
Initially, candidates gather to a meeting even before the campaign period barangay leaders for organizational purposes. Then series of meetings or caucuses are called if only to strengthen the candidacy of the candidate.
In fact, even after the election day – whether successful or not – a meeting is usually called.
Purpose?
They are either to assess the causes for the failure as bases for a future success in the next election or to have a victory party as an early celebration.
Definitely, all these gatherings or meetings incur expenses. And, when one speaks of expenses, it definitely means money.
And, who are these candidates in an election who won the race MINUS money as the vehicle?
To Short Cuts, seldom can one find such a creature! If one is to be found, he is not yet born. Maybe, he is still in his mother’s womb.
And, how about the cost of these sample ballots?
It is a usual practice that a candidate prepares two or four sample ballots in an election to be assured of a massive exposure in order to clinch victory. In fact even during political rallies, sample ballots are already distributed to the electorates.
And, at whose expense are these charged?
The answer is as simple as the sun rises at the east!
